

High Dynamic Range Travel Photography
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Just a few days into my third year of travel I stumbled across a style of photography altogether new to me. Known as high dynamic range (HDR), the technique involves taking multiple exposures (nominal, over and under) and blending the images together to deliver an image that might be more representative of what the human eye actually sees (which adjusts rapidly to absorb the details of both shadows and highlights).
I've fast fallen in love with this style of photography, and with my simple point-and-shoot camera have made it a regular part of my daily approach to travel photography.
Although the technique returns the best results with a dSLR shooting RAW files, on a tripod, and with plenty of time to digitally combine and retouch the composites, I'm certainly not doing as much. I shoot with a compact camera that takes JPEGs, free-holding 99% of the time, and with terribly limited time to spend processing and retouching photos.
So, even though images could look even better, the results are still pretty amazing to look at. It's an entirely new level of travel photography that makes images you're looking out just pop—I love it.
These are some of my favorite examples from the snapshots gallery (presented chronologically):
more from Bulgaria:
Chris
February 13th, 2009
hey Craig. I love your HDR photos, but I'm curious how you take such clear photos without using a tripod. all of my HDR photos tend to have a lot of ghosting because of my ridiculous shaking, plus, changing the exposure levels means the camera will move. Any pointers would be appreciated. I have a Canon SD 870 and also use Photomatrix.
Keep on traveling…
Chris
Craig | travelvice.com
February 13th, 2009
Thanks for the nice words Chris.
First, tuck you elbows to your chest, compose your shot, then exhale and keep you breath out for the duration of the shots. This is pretty much only possible if you're using autoexposure bracketing (AEB), like the little Nikon I'm currently using has.
In searching to see if you SD870 has AEB—which it looks like it does not—I came across this seemingly impressive(!) piece of software for Canon cameras:
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK
Sounds pretty amazing.
Second, if it's worth me taking the time to take one trio of photos to make the HDRIs, then it's worth me taking another trio, just in case. So, typically I'm always shooting a backup set, just in case the first has too much frame movement.
Aside from that, it's some quick retouching with Photoshop to correct marginal ghosting problems (where time permits, which it often doesn't) by blending one of the non-HDR images with the composite.
Happy snapping!
Roosh
February 13th, 2009
Surreal, incredible, spectacular
Andy
February 17th, 2009
Amazing shots, Craig! I think that given your choice of subjects they would have been good photos anyway, but the HDR really makes them outstanding!
Craig | travelvice.com
February 17th, 2009
Thanks Andy!
And thanks always and forever for the technical programming brainpower on Travelvice during those first years of site development/growth! (Andy is a PHP stallion)
Katherine
February 18th, 2009
The richness of color and detail in these is amazing. They make me feel as if I am seeing all of these places myself, in the late afternoon, after a summer rain shower has cleared away (the best of times in Florida). Thanks for posting!
Mark @ TravelWonders
March 16th, 2009
I've played a little with HDS but not a lot. The best results seem to be when the light varies dramatically across the photo. Otherwise to me, the effort (tripods, minimal movement in photo, extra work at the end to clean the photo up) isn't worth the marginal improvement in result.
Ulf
September 14th, 2009
great work for a small camera … wow
I suggest the Canon G9 or G10, both are compact but have manual regime, auto bracketing and RAW
As a tripod, check out the gorillapod from Joby, it is lightweight and extremely flexible … for the G9/10, I suggest the version for SLRs.
If you shoot in RAW, one picture can be sufficient to create a "pseudo-HDR", which has acceptable results (see here: http://www.ballofdirt.com/entr.....89985.html)