

Yellow Shirts and the Repression of Thailand
Khao Lak, Thailand
I'm traveling in a country where loving the King is a fashion statement unto itself.
Yellow shirts, everywhere I looked. I didn't remember Thailand being so full of them last time I was here, but that might have just been my lack of observation. So many Thais are wearing them, I started looking for a pattern—perhaps the color for service industry personnel, I thought.
I see them for sale absolutely everywhere, and had nearly convinced myself I had the answer, when I saw all the young school children in Ranong wearing the same thing. Hummm, I thought, there's more to this than I'm getting.
Most of the instructors at the kindergarten/primary school I visited were also wearing yellow, so at one point during my time there I asked what the deal was. The answer: It was the year of the King's 80th birthday, and people were wearing yellow—the official color of the king—to show their support. Naturally, it's more than just that—it's also fashionable to conform and do such things.
I don't know if the Thai people really love the King as much as they appear to, or if they've been doing it for so long (60 years) that they just don't bother asking themselves the question anymore—it's just assumed that you'll hang a photo of the King in your home or build a shrine in his honor at your business or wear a yellow shirt because he's turning 80-years-old.
I do know this: To openly disrespect the man will bring swift punishment. A Swiss fellow is now sitting in prison for the next 10-years for getting drunk in Bangkok and defacing a few posters with the Kings image on them. Putting money in your shoes is a no-no, as stepping on an image of the King is illegal in Thailand.
I've discovered the sensitive Thai government has even gone to such lengths as to recently ban (totally block, at the Internet Service Provider level) YouTube, a free repository of visitor-uploaded video clips. It would seem that someone a half a world away uploaded an armature video depicting disrespectful acts towards the image of the King, and when Google (who acquired YouTube in 2006) failed to remove it at the behest of Thailand, the Thai government responded by blocking the site from the entire country.
I'm very much against the suppression/censorship of Internet sites by the government. You cross a line when such acts are committed, and without much fuss it would seem the Thai people rolled over and accepted it—freedom sacrificed for the adoration of the King. This was not the start, and I guarantee this will not be the end of it for this country—good luck with that.
Comments:
Note: Comments are open to everyone. To reduce spam and reward regular contributors, only submissions from first-time commenters and/or those containing hyperlinks are moderated, and will appear after approval. Hateful or off-topic remarks are subject to pruning. Your e-mail address will never be publicly disclosed or abused.
Anguilla
Argentina
Belize
Bolivia
Brazil
Bulgaria
Cambodia
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Honduras
Hungary
Indonesia
Israel & Palestinian Terr.
Jordan
Laos
Lebanon
Malaysia
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Puerto Rico
Romania
Singapore
Slovakia
St. Martin
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Syria
Trinidad & Tobago
Turkey
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Vietnam
Craig | travelvice.com
October 14th, 2007
More stupidity…
Oct. 13: Days after the Thai government lifted a ban on the hugely popular video-sharing site YouTube last month, new content on the site has again offended Bangkok. The original ban on YouTube was in response to the site’s refusal to take down a few video clips making fun of Thailand’s immensely popular and genuinely revered monarch, King Bhumibol Adulyadej.
Banning YouTube had the unintended effect of spurring more interest in the issue, with furious debate in the Thai Internet community on the merit of the outright ban. Many Thais found the video clips offensive, but many did not think that justified banning the entire site. The five-month ban was lifted last month after Google - which owns YouTube - agreed to technically fix the clips so that viewers in Thailand could not see them. The more recently posted videos, titled Crisis of Siam, allege that the King’s top adviser, former prime minister Prem Tinsulanonda, engineered last year's coup d’etat and, moreover, harbours visions of splitting the royal family so that he can be the de facto power in Thailand. While clearly melodramatic conspiratorial propaganda, the clips are of a serious tone and also quite long, running for a combined 16 minutes in two parts. The head of the cyber crime department of the Ministry of Justice, was quoted in reports as saying the videos posed a serious threat to Thailand's security. The Straits Times/ANN
tom
September 13th, 2010
the king was born on a monday and the colour is somehow a monday colour. that is why people where the colour yellow, particularly at the start of the week